Medical Humanities and Charities! Beware Dr. Catherine Wilkins of USF! Dr. Wilkins Attempts to Steal Money from Charities Through Fraud!
Medical Charities and Medical Humanities!
Beware Dr. Catherine Wilkins of USF!
Dr. Wilkins Attempts to Steal Money from Charities Through Fraud and False Statements!
Dr. Catherine Wilkins, Art Historian.
Your “loved one” is fighting cancer and chemotherapy alone?
That means “PARTY TIME!” Right?
Go get your freak on, girl! Let your boyfriend die of cancer alone!
Cancer don’t stop no one’s fun, oh yeah, unless you’re the cancer patient that’s dying!
But that ain’t you dying, so go party like you don’t care, Catherine, because you don’t!
Dr. Catherine Wilkins, Interim Assistant Dean of University of South Florida Honors College (Judy Genshaft Honors College).
Her “loved one” (a cancer patient) constantly told Wilkins many things Wilkins was doing was wrong and immoral (how annoying!).
Her “loved one” constantly begged Wilkins to do the right and honorable thing and take corrective actions to be a better person (even more fucking annoying!).
She didn’t. Now Wilkins is the Interim Assistant Dean of University of South Florida Honors College (Judy Genshaft Honors College) by scamming, lies, and false honor.
Goes to show, you don’t need honor to reach high levels! Just fake it, until you make it!
Dr. Catherine Wilkins, Librarian.
Commits adultery with her supervisor in the library. Commits adultery with many others. Books are an aphrodisiac for adultery! Freaky-deaky librarian! Work that va-jay-jay! That’s what god put it there for! Put a new chapter in “Lady Chatterley’s Lover!”
Dr. Catherine Wilkins, Honors Professor.
Abuses a medical patient dying of cancer.
Now, that just makes you scum.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins, Community Leader.
Files fraudulent requests for funding, and makes fraudulent statements to gain advancement and recommendations in the arts and medical fields.
Now that ruins the education for a lot of students (and countless others) who see teachers as role models.
Why do the actions of Dr. Catherine Wilkins matter?
When a medical patient goes to USF campus to report evidence of Dr. Catherine Wilkins’ cheating and abuses, patient is instantly admonished by Dr. Wilkins’ arts professor. Dr. Wilkins engages in coverup and gaslighting to both the patient and USF, and continues various abuses on the patient. Dr. Wilkins for years does everything she can to prevent the patient reporting abuses.
Dr. Wilkins takes advantage of patient’s near-death and weakened state.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins then proceeds with her long career, now including community engagement programs such as “Connections: Mental Healthcare, Community Engagement, and Art” with the Tampa Museum of Art and a patient-shadowing program with the Emergency Medicine division of Tampa General Hospital.
Also this year, Dr. Wilkins led an Honors course entitled “How to Make History.” This course is a collaboration with St. Petersburg Beach Public Library and the Gulf Beaches Historical Museum.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins is now the Interim Assistant Dean of University of South Florida Honors College.
Dr. Wilkins is also Director of Medical Humanities Curriculum for the Morsani College of Medicine.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins used and abused the patient’s near-death medical condition (and appropriated other life details) in fraudulent applications and statements in which Dr. Catherine Wilkins attempted to receive funding, credit, and false honor for medical bills she never paid and care-taking she never gave.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins also used these false claims of good deeds, sacrifice, and accomplishment to promote her entire career in the arts and its connection to medicine and mental health.
It is ironic that Dr. Catherine Wilkins abused and detrimentally traumatized a cancer patient’s mental health, and used the information she gained and the false statements she made to have a career where she teaches courses such as “Connections: Mental Healthcare, Community Engagement, and Art.”
The medical patient, fighting cancer and the effects of chemotherapy alone, did not know all of Dr. Catherine Wilkins’ fraudulent uses of them and their near-death condition, but has tried to report her many times. Often the medical patient was too weak, or afraid the increased stress or time-and-energy-and-resource-consuming effort would kill them. Sometimes it nearly did.
Dr. Catherine Wilkins’ falsified and exaggerated applications for funding, and the related events, brings to light many issues and calls for many questions, among them:
Students, teachers, and professors may now say:
The “gloss” individuals put on themselves really works. Exaggeration and lies are effective.
Why can’t I cheat, exaggerate, and fabricate entire stories and actions on my scholarships, grants, or job applications? Dr. Wilkins did and got promoted many times.
Why can’t I cheat on my assignments or tests? Dr. Wilkins cheats.
Why can’t I invent positive deeds I never did? Dr. Wilkins invents.
Why do I actually have to do something, instead of just saying I did something?
Why can’t I take credit from others? Dr. Wilkins steals credit from what other people do.
Why do I have to report academic dishonesty or abuses? I can just say I filed a report, but not. I can even create fabricated evidence of filing a report, but not. That’s what Dr. Wilkins did.
If I am accused or about to be reported for academic cheating or abuses, I can just obfuscate, lie, coverup, and prevent the reporter or abused from informing authorities. That’s what Dr. Wilkins did.
It says it is okay to admonish the victim when trying to report academic dishonesty and abuse. (When a report could have been made earlier in person, Dr. Wilkins’ USF arts teacher at the time admonished the victim/medical patient and supported Dr. Wilkins.)
It says I can teach within the fields or related subjects that I committed my abuses. Dr. Wilkins does. (Dr. Wilkins should not be around medical patients.)
It calls into question all of Dr. Wilkins’ academic history; all of Dr. Wilkins’ scholarship applications, grant writing, written papers, her own recommendations from others, and her recommendations of or to others.
It calls into question all of Dr. Wilkins’ written papers or oral statements of claimed knowledge or research.
It calls into question all of Dr. Wilkins’ written papers or oral statements of claimed accomplishment.
It calls into question from those foundations and charities giving scholarships and grants, that Dr. Wilkins fabricates when requesting funding.
It calls into question all of Dr. Wilkins’ professional relationships, especially those with superiors, and if any have turned personal or sexual in ways that are unethical, dishonorable, or unbecoming of the institutions of education. It calls into question Dr. Wilkins’ active or willing participation in any such affairs or their coverups.
It provides many negative examples of lacking personal and relationship integrity, not merely professional. Teachers are role models. Students seeing how Dr. Wilkins conducts a personal life of adultery and dishonesty have their personal relationship foundations eroded if they follow her real-life example. Personal integrity at home, is as important (if not more so) as professional integrity. Ultimately, all integrity is interconnected.
It says Machiavellian tactics are helpful and productive to the individual.
It tells society, foundations, and charities to be increasingly weary of financial scams involving cancer (or any medical need). This tells society to disregard requests to help those with cancer, as it may be fraudulent. This is an immense detriment to those truly suffering from cancer, who need lifesaving funds and support.
The person that Dr. Wilkins deceptively uses in her request for funding applications is an abused orphan. This tells society they may further abuse an orphan, use an orphan’s status for their own gain, and not actually care for an orphan; just say they cared for them as they are in reality further being abused, whether child or adult. This says society may appropriate and dishonestly use to advantage the status of a weaker person, to increase and benefit the status of a more well-off person.
The person that Dr. Wilkins deceptively uses in her request for funding applications is a minority. This tells society that a Caucasian or race dominant in any society may continue to use, abuse, manipulate, disregard, steal from, gain from, appropriate from, and take advantage of a minority.
The person that Dr. Wilkins deceptively uses in her request for funding applications is a cancer patient. This tells society that medical patients have no rights. Medical patients may be used for illicit gain, manipulated, and abused — even as it leads to more suffering, more health issues, magnified health issues, mental trauma, and even if it may lead to the patients’ death or near-death through neglect, abuse, delays, or obstruction. It says medical patients may be used for unlawful gain.
It tells society when I commit consensual adultery, I can appropriate “rape” as my cover story. This has endless negative consequences for real-life rape victims and victims of sexual harassment or assault, and their ability to report such abuse and be taken seriously. While adultery should never be committed, this also has negative consequences for the person engaging in consensual adultery and being accused of rape. While both are immoral, there is a difference.
The medical patient Dr. Wilkins uses in her fraudulent applications for funding and honor, is also a real-life multiple-incident rape survivor from childhood. Appropriating “rape” to defend oneself in committing consensual adultery (as Dr. Wilkins tried to in a related incident with David Brodosi, also of USF) is an atrocity to real-life rape survivors. Real-life rape victims suffer enough from the incident, and suffer enough from their struggle for justice. Rape should never be appropriated to excuse the guilt of adultery (as Dr. Wilkins tried to).
It says when I am abusing someone, I just need to say: “I am taking care of them.”
Dr. Wilkins’ academic abuses may diminish the arts and humanities in the eyes of others. Artists already struggle for accreditation, funding, and respect.
It says honor at an Honors College is just a name, but not a reality.
It says one does not need true integrity, they just have to fake integrity. That integrity is superficial.